Two articles released simultaneously by physicists at University College
London (UCL) unveil a new theory that consistently combines quantum physics
and gravity while maintaining Einstein's traditional view of
spacetime.

The two cornerstones of modern physics are Einstein's general theory of
relativity, which explains gravity through the bending of spacetime, and
quantum theory, which controls the tiniest particles in the universe.
However, there is a conflict between these two hypotheses, and a solution
has eluded researchers for more than a century.

The general consensus has been that Einstein's theory of gravity has to be
"quantized," or changed, to make it compatible with quantum theory. This is
the methodology of two prominent contenders for a quantum theory of gravity:
loop quantum gravity and string theory.

The consensus is challenged by a new theory, however, which was created by
Professor Jonathan Oppenheim of UCL Physics & Astronomy and presented in
a
publication
in Physical Review X. This theory suggests that spacetime could be
classical, meaning it might not be governed by quantum theory at all.

The hypothesis—dubbed a "postquantum theory of classical gravity"—modifies
quantum theory and anticipates an innate breakdown in predictability
mediated via spacetime, rather than altering spacetime. If an object's
apparent weight is measured accurately enough, this leads to
larger-than-expected random and violent fluctuations in spacetime, which are
not consistent with the predictions of quantum theory.

A second study, undertaken by former Ph.D. students of Professor Oppenheim
and concurrently
published
in Nature Communications, examines some of the implications of the theory
and suggests a test procedure that involves accurately measuring a mass to
determine if its weight seems to change over time.

For instance, a 1 kg mass—which was once the 1 kg standard—is regularly
weighed by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in France. The
idea can be ruled out if the variations in measurements of this 1 kg mass
are less than what is necessary for mathematical consistency.

Professor Oppenheim,
Professor Carlo Rovelli, and Dr. Geoff Penington—leading proponents of quantum loop gravity and string theory,
respectively—are betting 5000:1 on the experiment's result or any other
evidence that emerges that would support the quantum vs. classical nature of
spacetime.

The UCL research team has been investigating the implications of the idea
and putting it to the test for the last five years.

Professor Oppenheim stated, "It's critical to comprehend how the
mathematical incompatibilities between quantum theory and Einstein's general
theory of relativity are reconciled. Is it better to change quantum theory,
quantize spacetime, or do something else entirely? It's anybody's guess now
that we have a consistent basic theory that avoids quantization of
spacetime."

As a Ph.D. candidate at UCL, co-author Zach Weller-Davies contributed
significantly to the theory and helped create the experimental plan. He
stated, "This discovery challenges our understanding of the fundamental
nature of gravity but also offers avenues to probe its potential quantum
nature."

We have demonstrated that in the absence of a quantum component,
spacetime's curvature must exhibit random fluctuations with an empirically
verifiable trace.

"Spacetime must be undergoing violent and random fluctuations all around us
in both quantum gravity and classical gravity, but on a scale that we
haven't yet been able to detect." However, in order for spacetime to be
considered classical, the fluctuations must exceed a specific threshold,
which may be established by an additional experiment that examines the
duration of time that a heavy atom can be in superposition—that is, in two
distinct places at the same time."

The effort was guided by the analytical and numerical calculations of
co-authors Dr. Carlo Sparaciari and Dr. Barbara Å oda, who expressed hope
that these tests may ascertain if pursuing a quantum theory of gravity is
the appropriate course of action.

Dr. Å oda, who was previously the Physics & Astronomy professor at UCL
and is currently at the Perimeter Institute of Theoretical Physics in
Canada, stated, "We can think of the question in terms of whether the rate
at which time flows has a quantum nature, or classical nature, because
gravity is made manifest through the bending of space and time.

"And testing this is almost as simple as testing whether the weight of a
mass is constant, or appears to fluctuate in a particular way."

"The object must be weighed with extreme precision, even though the
experimental concept is straightforward," stated Dr. Sparaciari of UCL
Physics & Astronomy.

What excites me, though, is that we can establish a direct correlation
between two quantifiable quantities—the size of spacetime fluctuations and
the length of time that atoms or apples may be placed in quantum
superposition of two distinct locations—starting from very broad
assumptions. Then, we may conduct experiments to identify these two
quantities."

Weller-Davies said, "If quantum objects like atoms are able to bend
classical spacetime, then there must be a delicate interplay. The size of
the random fluctuations in spacetime and the wave nature of atoms must be
fundamentally balanced."

Two complementary experimental proposals are put out to test whether
spacetime is classical or quantum. The first seeks to confirm the quantum
character of spacetime by searching for "gravitationally mediated
entanglement."

Not involved in today's announcement, Professor Sougato Bose of UCL Physics
& Astronomy stated that experiments to test the nature of spacetime
"will take a large-scale effort, but they're of huge importance from the
perspective of understanding the fundamental laws of nature." Bose was among
those who first proposed the entanglement experiment. Though these things
are hard to forecast, I think these studies are doable, and maybe in 20
years we'll know the answer."

Beyond gravity, the postquantum theory has ramifications. Quantum
superpositions inevitably localize through their interaction with classical
spacetime, negating the requirement for the notorious and controversial
"measurement postulate" of quantum theory.

Professor Oppenheim's quest to find a solution to the black hole
information problem served as inspiration for the idea. Since information
cannot be destroyed, normal quantum theory states that an item falling into
a black hole should radiate back out in some way. However, this defies
general relativity, which states that objects that cross a black hole's
event horizon can never be known to exist. The new theory permits
information annihilation because of a basic failure in prediction.

*Provided by University College London*